OUR MEMBERS

WIN 80% OF THEIR FANTASY FOOTBALL MATCH-UPS. ...ARE YOU? JOIN NOW!
THE ORIGINAL FANTASY FOOTBALL ANALYZERS CUSTOM CHEAT SHEETS FOR YOUR SCORING SYSTEM 1.7 MILLION FANTASY TEAMS ANALYZED SINCE 2004 NO SOFTWARE DOWNLOAD MONEY BACK GUARANTEE!
          Need advice? Have a Fantasy Football Tip?
 

Sound Off about Fantasy Football in our STARTERS Forums

Register Today to take advantage of this fantastic software!


Save This Page Back to Forum Main
Topic: Macgehee, Ryan Williams, Stephen Jackson or Ben Tate?
jeff_129376
Membership: Retired
Joined: October 10
Total Posts: 192
Offline
Post Date: 09/28/12 12:23
I need two of the three. Arian foster is my #1 and already in starting lineup - need two of the other four for the other RB spot and the flex. My receivers are weak.

Houston Plays the titans - so tate and foster should both be big. It would be a bit of a "hedge" if I play both in case of a rout.

Macgehee - plays against oakland. If he is "active" on game day - feel as though he is a must play.

Stephen jackson - for now - he is my 4th choice out of four. St louis cannot run...seattle is a tough D..and he is banged up.

ryan williams. The wildcard. Should I play him over tate of macgehee? The cardinals will give him the chance to do alot this game. He will probably get more carriers than most of the others..the question is..will he do anything with the chance?



I guess if it was right now and macgehee was healthy - I would go with him and tate. But...may do williams over tate? I think the cardinals will have the lead..the D will tear up tannehill..and they will run the ball big time.



non ppr. Thoughts? need two of these four.
jeff_129376
Membership: Retired
Joined: October 10
Total Posts: 192
Offline
Post Date: 09/28/12 12:26
OH yea - I also have jerome simpson - but I do not think I want to play him over the running backs in the flex on his week back. He would be a fifth option - but a big unknown on game one back. My starting receivers are vincent jackson and dez bryant - so Simpson would be my flex. I think outside of stephen jackson either of the other RB's are a better flex play this week.
 Throwball Heroes_118522
Moderator
Membership: Starter
Joined: June 10
Total Posts: 14936
Favorite Team:

Offline
Post Date: 09/28/12 12:30
I start McGahee as long as the ribs don't give him any issue before the game, he rolled up big numbers last year vs OAK. SEA and MIA are ranked 6 amd 7 respectively in the FP/PG. With two starters, in Williams and Jackson, you gotta run with Jackson, even though he probably has the tougher match up. I do think Tate could put up some nice numbers, but hard to start him when you have two starters.
----
Stephen
http://www.the6thfloor.com/category/fantasy-football-2/

"Bringing confusion and contradiction to YOUR post!"
"ISIYBITSI" -Russ Bliss
jeff_129376
Membership: Retired
Joined: October 10
Total Posts: 192
Offline
Post Date: 09/28/12 12:33
Thanks throwball. The Lineup analyzer says the same as you - macgahee first....then stephen jackson...leave williams and tate on bench.. Although..the gap between jackson and williams keeps decreasing - probably mostly due to beanie wells injury. stephen jackson..was a third round pick for me...and has been very painful to watch. Bad draft choice for me....and I feel as though he has no chance against seattle defense. I feel like williams has more a chance against miami. Tough decision. Some guy in an article in the yahoo site said if you have foster and tate - this is the one week to start both of them...as they will run all over tennessee.

Thanks
 Throwball Heroes_118522
Moderator
Membership: Starter
Joined: June 10
Total Posts: 14936
Favorite Team:

Offline
Post Date: 09/28/12 12:39
Jeff it's like saying I draft a poor player in Larry Fitzgerald in the 3rd round. When these picks came up those players (Fitz & Jackson) were quite possibly the best player available at that position that we were chasing. If I was looking for a RB in the 3rd, and Jackson was there I probably would have grabbed him as well.

The starting Foster and Tate show is not an every week thing. I do agree this is one of those weeks where both could post numbers, but I couldn't start him comfortably knowing I have two starters available. It's a chance you take.
----
Stephen
http://www.the6thfloor.com/category/fantasy-football-2/

"Bringing confusion and contradiction to YOUR post!"
"ISIYBITSI" -Russ Bliss
Viewing posts(1-5)
Post
Message
Plain text ONLY, no HTML avoid > and < in text

“I am advancing to the championship game in both of my leagues and I believe a lot of the credit goes to those of you in this forum and the many tools that we have access to”. (Ron 3 year member)


 “This site greatly helped me make it through this year in both my leagues and all the great help from other members thanks very much fellas!” (Courtney first year member)


 “I am hosting one league on NFL.com as well. Personally I thing there projections are way out of sync and have been less than reliable. I completely ignored them all year and instead took input from the LA at FFS which has proven to be much more accurate”. (Hooked 5 year Member)
Sign up and get our FREE email newsletter and Fantasy Football advice!